HA&W
404-892-9651

SSAE 16 and Service Organization Control (SOC) reporting approach replaces SAS 70

AICPA SOC SAS 70 Reports

Many service organizations presently completing SAS 70 reports will find they need to significantly change their reporting to comply with the new AICPA SOC reporting approach. Most service organizations will find they need to increase the transparency of the systems description and revise their controls to meet the underlying requirements for risk based design of controls. Service organizations who are presently preparing SAS 70 reports where their services do not affect their users' internal control over financial reporting will need to make what could be fundamental changes to their reporting approach.

Since the early 1990s, SAS 70 has filled a critically important role in minimizing the over auditing of service organizations whose output affects their clients' financial statements. In part because of its success in this role, and in part because of a lack of clear alternatives, demand for SAS 70 has grown far beyond its limited scope and purpose to the point where SAS 70 reports are oftentimes requested when they are not appropriate for the circumstances.

The new AICPA SOC reporting approach recognizes that there is not a one-size-fits-all approach for service organizations reporting and enables service providers more clear alternatives to provide reporting that both meets their internal management needs and the reporting needs of their users (and prospective users.) SOC recognizes that a service organization's outputs affect not just financial risks (e.g., SAS 70), but also the operational and compliance related risks of their users. Under the SOC reporting approach, users of service organizations can expect to receive reports that better align with their needs to know how the service is being delivered and that the controls the service organization has deployed are adequate to protect their business interests.

The following provides a summary of each of the three SOC reporting alternatives recently announced by the AICPA:

  • AICPA SOC 1 is the branding for reports delivered under the recently released SSAE 16 that replaces SAS 70. SOC 1 is designed to conform to international standards, and has heightened requirements in the form of risk based design of controls, and system transparency. Like SAS 70, SOC 1 is only applicable in situations where a service organization's controls are likely to be relevant to user entities' internal control over financial reporting ("ICFR"). As has been the case with SAS 70 reports, these reports are available in both Type I and Type II formats, where Type II covers a period of time, usually six months or more, to represent testing for operational effectiveness.

Click here for more information on SOC 1 for SSAE 16 / SAS 70

  • AICPA SOC 2 is a Report on Controls at a Service Organization relevant to Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and/or Privacy. The SOC 2 report is structured similar to the SOC 1 report in that management of the Service Organization provides a detailed assertion addressing the system that delivers the services represented by the scope of services covered by the report, as well as the controls designed and deployed to support the system. The control structure for the SOC 2 is based on pre-defined control objectives for one or more of the SOC 2 control domains (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and/or Privacy). Under SOC 2, the Service Organization tailors their design of control activities to align to the specific circumstances related to services delivered to those user entities for which the report is intended. The SOC 2 report also is available in both Type I and Type II formats.

Click here for more information on SOC 2 for Security, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Availability, and Privacy

  • AICPA SOC 3 is what was known as a Trust Services Report. This is a more general purpose report than that represented by a SOC 2. The auditor's opinion in this report is simply related to the Service Organization's deployment of the specific criteria represented by one or more of the Trust Servicesprinciples for Security, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Availability, or Privacy. As opposed to a SOC 2 report, which includes Control Objectives related to specific services, the SOC 3 report strictly addresses the criteria covered by one or more of the Trust Services principles for Security, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Availability, or Privacy. This report is more general purpose and less detailed than a SOC 2 report, but is still expected to meet the needs of many users who need both a strong control structure to meet internal management needs and a reporting framework that provides their clients and prospects independent assurance regarding the deployment of these controls.

Click here for more information about SOC 3 for Trust Services Principles and Criteria

DANIEL SCHROEDER, CPA, MBA, CISA, CIA, CISM

Daniel Schroeder
CPA, MBA, CISA, CIA, CISM

dan.schroeder@hawcpa.com

 

Quick Links

Staff | Careers | Pay Online
Peer Review | Today's Tax Alert
HA&W Chinese Web Site


eNewsletter
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:


Accounting Today - 2011 Top 100 Firms
an independent member of Baker Tilly International
Inside Public Accounting - 2011 Top 50 Firms


For more information, call 404-892-9651 (Atlanta, GA) or 941-955-4429 (Sarasota, FL) or send email to info@hawcpa.com. Atlanta, GA: Five Concourse Parkway Suite 1000 Atlanta, GA 30328. Sarasota, FL: 1990 Main Street, Suite 750 Sarasota, FL 34236. Copyright © Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP. All Rights Reserved.